
The topic of overtraining continues to be an area of interest to me as a coach and athlete. I see it as an often times overlooked and misunderstood aspect of programming. Little exist into the exactness of the state.
There are coaches who don't subscribe to the idea of over training. When an athlete is over trained they mention poor nutrition and bad sleep habits.
I agree that these might be a good starting point to the investigation but once it has been established that these are solidly in place then the program itself should be examined.
One of the shortcomings of posting workouts, such as the ones posted here, is that assumptions are made as to the recovery skills of those who undertake such workouts.
Athlete A might not have the recovery abilities of athlete B,C,D and F. A program that crushes B might only make C break a sweat.
Shouldn't the training (stimulus) be appropriate to produce a positive outcome yet not crush or overtrain the subject? Why train more than what is necessary to bring about supercompensation?
Dr. Doug McGuff looks at exercise stimulus from this perspective.
....With regard to the stimulus, the basic issues to be identified are the concentration of the drug and the dosage of the drug. Analogous issues in exercise would be the intensity of the exercise and amount of exercise performed per session. With regard to response, our researchers would wait to record the desired response and note at what point in time this response occurs. The amount of time it takes the response to occur is what dictates an optimum dosing schedule. The key when designing a therapeutic drug is to optimize the concentration so that minimum dosing is required to produce a maximum response. Likewise the key in bodybuilding (exercise training) should be to optimize intensity so that minimum exercise duration and frequency is required to produce a maximum growth response. I know from my own athletic past and from programming I've laid out. There has been some overdosing.
Dose appropriate programming for me would net:
-A positive long term trend of improvement (not linear but more up than down)
-A stable body mass trend
-A consistent morning heart rate
-Regular sleep patterns
-A desire to train.
-A positive mental outlook
Then there is the question. What if less training could be implemented and the same positive trend could be realized? Wouldn't the risk of injury and overtraining be reduced?
Is your training dose appropriate? What about the athletes you lead? Are your cookie cutter programs right for the whole?
This just in...